#AGENDA 2030 PDF FREE#
Consider his reference to 'a collision of cultures.' Does this effect the free expression of Christianity? Will evangelism be labelled 'ethnic superiority"? It's a truism that globalism has led to a collision of cultures,' the President continued. "We must reject any form of fundamentalism, or racism or a belief in ethnic superiority that makes our traditional identities irreconcilable with modernity. "In order to move forward, we do have to acknowledge that the existing path to global integration requires a course correction,' Obama said. The 2030 Agenda was endorsed last month, by President Obama in his farewell speech to the UN General Assembly. Yet, the heads of state agreed to work toward implementation, largely through secret trade deals and back room bureaucratic rule making, according to reports. The plan bypasses US Congress and the legislatures of the world's other 193 nations.
Among those who gave endorsement to the programme were US President Barack Obama and Pope Francis.
(In other words, a scheduled approach to one world government). It introduced 'a new universal agenda' for all mankind. A related theme is how the notion of HS has evolved over time in the UN context: illustrating its inherently rights-based approach, we may identify its relevance for gender equality.This time last year the United Nations approved The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It can therefore be interesting to build a bridge between the HS and gender empowerment discourses. It can therefore speak directly to the notion of gender equality, because these various dimensions of HS play out very differently for women and men – most palpably at the level of personal security. The HS concept is intrinsically about the economic, social, environmental, political and personal security of individuals. 1 Introduction The discourses on gender equality and empowerment, on the one hand, and human security (HS), on the other, do not often merge. A policy pyramid is proposed as a contribution to making the gender dimension more prominent, and in order to introduce the notion of HS into policy-making. This leads to a discussion of policy ideas, based on a normative reading of HS, which could help address the persistent gender inequities, as well as encompass the visions of the SDGs. stitch these topics together: starting from a brief overview of gender inequities, it suggests how the HS concept might be useful for analysing gender and rights in the SDGs and post-2015 agenda, and for creating a holistic, universal, transformative policy approach. The article tackles four interrelated topics: gender and empowerment, and its lacunae the potential usefulness of the human security (HS) concept for addressing gender and human rights the current negotiations regarding the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and a universal, post-2015 agenda and the missing role of the state in the current development debate. Whether this could succeed in light of political constellations is open, and requires an idealistic faith in the power of ideas. The article concludes with a case for instrumentalising the commitments of the 2030 Agenda, but complemented by a subversive approach – injecting radical thinking and action for economic, environmental and social justice. Both critical theory and sufficiency economics propose shifts in norms, policies and practice – and argue for a “hierarchy reversal”, whereby social and climate justice goals override the economic rationale. It also seeks to examine whether the Agenda refers to. It asks whether and to what extent the Agenda’s goals are transformative, but finds numerous omissions and clashes. This article looks at two interrelated questions. The UN 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development impresses with its ambition of transformation, and because it has succeeded in marrying economic, social and environmental goals.
0 kommentar(er)
